What is a necessary requirement for a jurat that is not required in an acknowledgment?

A jurat requires the signer to take an oath or affirmation that the contents of the document are true, which is a critical aspect distinguishing it from an acknowledgment. In a jurat, the notary certifies that the signer has sworn to the truthfulness of the statements in the document, providing a legal assurance of the document's legitimacy. This sworn testimony adds a layer of integrity to the document and is fundamental to the purpose of a jurat.

In contrast, an acknowledgment simply confirms that the signer voluntarily signed the document, without the requirement for an oath or affirmation. The focus in an acknowledgment is on the act of signing rather than verifying the truthfulness of the statements within the document. Therefore, the necessity of an oath or affirmation in a jurat is what sets it apart from an acknowledgment.